Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 08:18

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Our planet’s oxygen levels will drop, and there’s no way to stop it - Boy Genius Report
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What is the dirtiest thing you have allowed your husband to do?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Record-breaking cosmic structure discovered in colossal galaxy cluster - Phys.org
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Lexus Could Get Its Own Version Of Toyota GR’s Next Sports Coupe - Carscoops
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Seahawks defenders want to "put the team on our back" - NBC Sports
Thank you.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
The European Central Bank is almost guaranteed to cut rates. Here's what could happen next - CNBC